While I am not a lawyer and Apache 2.0 is likely to be unproblematic, I always find it puzzling as to why people recently are opting to license non-software using software licenses (Apache 2.0 in particular). Hopefully you have access to sensible lawyers, but I was always under the expectation that model weights would fall under a license such as CC-BY rather than Apache 2.0. Sadly it has been too long since I read the recommendations and justifications for this, so I can not find a good reference, but seem to recall the advice came out of FSF.
Either way, huge fan, it would be awesome to have a LLaMA set of weights that are fully open.
We are appreciative to the work done by the growing open-source AI community that made this project possible.
That includes:
Participants in building the RedPajama dataset including […] LAION.
Meta AI — […].
EleutherAI — This project is built on the backs of the great team at EleutherAI — including the source code they provided for training GPT-NeoX.
An award of computer time was provided by the INCITE program. This research also used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF), which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.”
The answer to your question is right there at the bottom of the page in the linked-to blog post :/