because i'm in agreement with the grandparent comment that why is the topic subject to legal holds vs just having a meeting in person? Are in person meetings rquired to have a voice recorder present? it seems like a weird legal precedent.
because i'm in agreement with the grandparent comment that why is the topic subject to legal holds vs just having a meeting in person? Are in person meetings rquired to have a voice recorder present? it seems like a weird legal precedent.
In the court's eyes, it's analogous to writing notes to each other, only to burn them the next day.
The way this is worded there's no record, so there's no "slated for deletion"?
I guess the question becomes, if it exists inside computer memory, is that legally equivalent to "writing down piece of paper" and thusly is considered destroying evidence?
If I write something in disappearing ink (let's say it perfectly disappears), it's not destroying evidence? is it?
For argument's sake, let's say it's not. It's a tunneled connection and all stops in between are only acting as relays.
Is it still wiping it then if it only exists in memory and then gets garbage collected? is that destroying evidence?... maybe...?
It sounds like you are looking for the laws “that requires google to hold the data for this particular topic.”