> Thanks to the open-source efforts like LLaMA ...

Is the LLaMA model really open source now? Last I checked it was only licensed for non-commercial use, which isn't open source software at least. Have they changed the license? Are people depending on "databases can't be copyrighted"? Are people just presuming they won't be caught?

There's lots of OSS that can use LLaMA but that's different from the model itself.

This is a genuine question, people are making assertions but I can't find evidence for the assertions.