Disclosure: I work at Databricks.
Disclosure: I work at Databricks.
GPT-NeoX is not that different than GPT-J (it also has the rotary embeddings, which llama.cpp supports for GPT-J). I would imagine it's not too heavy of a lift to add NeoX architecture support
-
Thank you.
Just so I am clear, "parameters" refers to the number of total node-relation-connections btwn a single node and its neighbors for that Prompt/Label? Or how would you explain this ELI5 style?
DollyV2 is a Pythia model fine tuned on the Databricks 15K dataset
https://github.com/ggerganov/ggml/tree/master/examples/gpt-j
AFAIK there is no .cpp version of Pythia-12B yet
GPT3.5/GPT4 is what everyone would also love to see but I understand you're performance is inline with GPT-neoX.
Vicuna/GPT4all would be intersting but IMO are less important.
RWKV would be interesting because it's a completely different model from the transformers.
EDIT: Also thanks for the opensource contributions! Highly appreciated!
If possible, could you share how Dolly v2 compares to RWKV-4 14B ctx 8019?