> that deserve to be robbed
Even if I dislike people I still don't condone stealing from them.
Even if I dislike people I still don't condone stealing from them.
Laws are the tools written to control the general public by the elites, good luck with that.
This is a hilariously naive take on how the world works
Persecuting based on class in a society with such an unequal distribution of wealth? Fair game.
They're already at war with us; don't carry their water for them and pretend we're "equal before the law" or some such nonsense. We clearly aren't.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2017/1/31/galant-welcomin...
The same "arguments" could be made by replacing the word "steal" with "murder" and I would still have the same position and principles, because I also do not condone murder even if the person being murdered is someone I despise.
I think in all contexts stealing is wrong, it's just in some contexts stealing being wrong doesn't matter because the alternative of dying makes it a moot point.
> What about a partisan group opposing an occupation?
This was answered as essentially war-time activity. It's still wrong to steal from someone, but again the alternative of being killed makes it a moot point.
> At what point is stealing permissible?
Stealing is still wrong, it's just that it can obviously exist in scenarios that are so wrong for other reasons that the stealing is the least of concern.