This sounds like a lot of fun! It’s also great that you’re encouraging this - having a passion is great, and following it through to this level is fantastic for development.

I have a question. When you ask an LLM to summarise the rules of the language in a concise manner, and it does so, is it… disheartening?

I mean, if you put a lot of work into creating something, and it gets described in terms that basically make it feel like a configuration - given a glossary and a set of toggles and fill in the blank settings (e.g. word boundaries), out pops a language.

Does seeing that make it feel somewhat less exciting?