You might be surprised, and possibly alarmed, at the number of psychology studies (including some of the most well known) that are based on cohorts of undergraduate students at the institution conducting the study.
I feel like undergrads who are participating in a study only because they’re told to will shift the results a bit.
Like, I can see there being a difference between a truly random sample from the overall population vs. students who are required to participate, but how much of a difference are you going to see between local students who volunteer vs. local college students doing this 'as part of their homework'.
There I was, earning nothing, a little shy on cash, but I had a job offer in a few months for a decent little software job. I said I preferred the money now.
No idea what it was about but must have been research.
I ended up quitting the Psych major with one credit remaining, and begrudgingly grinded through CS instead.
So you graduated a CS major with a double minor in Math and Psych? Interesting.
Incidentally it was a double CS + Psych that I started with, but I abandoned the psych portion and did the entire CS part in the last two years. Would not recommend.