Hacker News Reader

Comment by jchung | Hacker News Reader

Forgot about the layer where designers do work for free in the hopes of besting their peers in design battle to win a disappointingly small payoff.

View on HN

We started 99designs to provide opportunities to designers. Each month more and more designers make meaningful salaries from the site and connect with customers that they would otherwise have had to pitch for. Customers who wouldn't have previously paid for design are learning design is worth paying for.

It's hard for any industry to face change, but developers survived outsourcing and photographers survived stock photography. Both industries are still flourishing.

You forgot to mention that the precursor to 99designs - Sitepoint Marketplace - was initiated by designers themselves. It only happened because designers wanted it. If 99designs didn't formalise it, someone else would've. It's called emergence; it's one of the most fundamental processes in society and indeed nature.

I had the worst experience using 99designs. The "designers" were terrible. The sketches they submitted shows that they barely have any design skills, when I reject their designs they start to complain and build up bad reputation around you.

Most if not all freelancing sites start well until they are discovered by unqualified people from India and the likes.

I'm looking at the case studies of completed designs. They seem fairly unsatisfactory to me.

Get over it http://t.co/tAWNMXGs

http://pandodaily.com/2012/01/24/get-over-it-haters-99design...

Check out the PandoDaily article that published this month for some success stories...

http://pandodaily.com/2012/01/24/get-over-it-haters-99design...

Even many US & UK based designers find it more more worthwhile to use 99designs as a customer acquisition channel vs. doing unpaid proposal writing, pitching, or expensive paid advertising which has no guarantee of results.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com