Is your claim that all reasoning is ultimately math we do unconsciously? That humans "reason" via word-association and probability? That seems to be what you're suggesting, but I don't want to conclude that without your say-so.
I believe literally none of those things, and have explicitly stated the opposite of at least one of them on this page.
At this point I think an LLM would do a better job of responding to my comments, based on context and syntax alone.