From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html:
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
I'm sure there are similar things for FireFox or Chromium browsers but Hush seems Safari-only.
AdGuard has most all filters enabled except the language-specific ones and the «Other» category.
It’s been how many years now and GDPR has done very little to improve anything despite the cookie prompts on websites everywhere?
At this point they are as useful as TOS (not) with the annoyance of seeing one every website.
But if it was only Firefox, people would simply add banners saying "Firefox is not supported." since it's only like 3% of marketshare these days.
The distinction is legal, not technical; so it has to be enforced by legal, not technical means.
Furthermore, there is the important distinction about multiple uses of the same data. There are uniquely identifiable cookies that are functionally required for one purpose but the site may want to use it for other purposes as well (e.g. share that data with heir "trusted partners" for targeted advertising) for which user may reasonably want to refuse permission, so a browser accepting a cookie doesn't imply such permission and something extra is required.