> It's astoundingly useful and you are wrong here.
It may be useful, but I'm not wrong here.
Software engineers and the like are too-frequently technology fetishists that are like the proverbial guy who has a hammer and thinks everything is a nail.
Even if "innovative games with cool interfaces" is the right way to educate kids, which is very unlikely to be true, those games aren't going to be spat out by ChatGPT.
And if they can be spat out by ChatGPT, why even bother educating most of those kids at all?