Presumably the reason Obama, Bush and Clinton won't be charged with crimes is that there isn't enough evidence that they committed any crimes for a prosecutor to seek an indictment.
IMO any case made against a DA's political opponents should rest on solid ground, not untested legal theories.
It's disturbing that so many people are willing to throw away the legal system in order to prosecute someone they don't like.
> IMO any case made against a DA's political opponents should rest on solid ground, not untested legal theories.
Exactly. It's an even bigger violation of the principle that "the law should apply to political leaders" to abuse the law in order to prosecute one.
I'm no fan of Trump, but any case against him should be strong, not something so weird that an acrobat would have trouble jumping through all the hoops. Unfortunately, Trump broke America, including his opponents, and now they're out for blood and are willing to go as low or even lower than him to get it.