Enjoy your life however you choose, but your cynicism is lazy and derivative. ChatGPT has created(!) a bunch of quests for me to play with my kids and we’ve all walked away with smiles on our faces. I was so impressed with the contents that I actually googled a bit to see if the plot was stolen wholesale from some existing module, and found nothing.
Personally, I think all creative endeavors are a regurgitation of rules ingested by the creator. Creativity is born from experiences.
While I believe you have lived a unique set of circumstances that have been processed by you, a delightful and fallible chemical soup inside a meat sack, and that it cannot be approximated.
That's the thing, AI tools aren't trying to approximate me. They are their own unique collection of experiences/input.
And they can be approximated.
This is just substrate supremacism.
I don't think so. I also believe in the unique perspective of a mushroom, and a computer program. And try as you may, I can distinguish you from both.
Every story has already been told.
It works very similar to what we call "creative" output from humans
I guess we can cross this one off our 'LLM Bingo Card'. Since there's literally millions of examples of why this isn't true, I can use a different one every time this gets brought up.
Metal Gear Solid 4 is a Hideo Kojima game about how Hideo Kojima doesn't want to make Metal Gear Solid 4. ChatGPT has infinite patience. It could never write Metal Gear Solid 4 even if you told it to, because it'd be lying.
Wonderful! Can you please describe the algorithm?
Huh? Can you describe human’s creative algorithm? If not how can you say that ChatGPT is different?