I think the argument here is over the OpenAI Terms of Service, not copyright.
I think the argument here is over the OpenAI Terms of Service, not copyright.
Seems to me that’s an issue between you and OpenAI. (Does your blog or code repository actually have published restrictive terms of service? Did it when OpenAI accessed it? Did OpenAI even access it?)
Microsoft is out there laundering GPL code with Copilot. These companies live firmly in the don't give a fuck region of capitalism. Copyright law for thee, not for me.
Maybe if they had put in their terms of service "you can only share this on sites with their own ToS that allow sharing but disallow using the content for training models, and also replicate this requirement", I don't see how you could have any sort of viral ToS like that.
Seems more like it's just a bad idea to rely heavily on another LLM's output for training.