Seems unlikely that the target of any suspicion is directed at unaccredited futures traders since by definition, they will have to be dealing in small amounts. Large amounts would make one an accredited investor by definition since high net worth makes one accredited.
> For example, in February 2019, after receiving information "regarding HAMAS transactions" on Binance, Lim explained to a colleague that terrorists usually send "small sums" as "large sums constitute money laundering." Lim's colleague replied: "can barely buy an AK47 with 600 bucks." And with regard to certain
Binance customers, including customers from Russia, Lim acknowledged in a February 2020 chat: "Like come on. They are here for crime." Binance's MLRO agreed that "we see the bad, but we close 2 eyes."
So... some compliance officer received information about terrorists allegedly using Binance and made a light hearted comment about it? The CFTC is not going to mention whatever preventative measures they took to prevent similar transactions from occurring in the future, they're trying to make them look bad through innuendo for this lawsuit and also probably to jeopardize their banking relationships.