1) it's open source.
2) you can run it yourself so the rug won't be pulled from under you when they decide to shutdown and move users up to the next version or another product as they've done with the older text-davinci models.
3) you get to align it (using RLFH) as opposed to a corporation dictating what is "aligned" and what is "safe."
4) you won't have to deal with government led censorship. For example, instead of the FBI using JIRA to manage a list of URLs to be censored (as they did according to the latest revelations) they can train the AI to self-censor as Bing has done.
5) you won't be using the product of a company that was started as a non-profit with $100M donation (from Elon Musk) to promote transparent AI only to take that money and turn into a for-profit company and close-source the AI.
Sources:
Elon is the source for #5 and Matt Taibbi is the source for #4. I doub't you'll have a problem sourcing #5 so here is the source for #4:
"31. After the 2020 election, when EIP was renamed the Virality Project, the Stanford lab was on-boarded to Twitter’s JIRA ticketing system, absorbing this government proxy into Twitter infrastructure – with a capability of taking in an incredible 50 million tweets a day." --Matt Taibbi on Twitter https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1633830104144183298
I had never heard of this, and it seemed important, some cursory research turned up many twitter posts from individuals amplifying your version of events.
I also found a write up on the situation from TechDirt[0]. The article is fairly good and well sourced, but it paints a substantially different picture than what you describe.
[0]https://www.techdirt.com/2023/02/15/extraordinarily-confused...
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1633830104144183298
"31. After the 2020 election, when EIP was renamed the Virality Project, the Stanford lab was on-boarded to Twitter’s JIRA ticketing system, absorbing this government proxy into Twitter infrastructure – with a capability of taking in an incredible 50 million tweets a day."
O(T²) speed is only for naive attention. There's a ton of possible optimizations for attention that give you something closer to O(T).
If Elon is reading this, his Based AI should invest in this project and its sponsors.
What is at stake here is nothing less than the future of humanity.
I hope people pay attention.
It's crazy that you're 100% right. I can't believe that we're living through this, honestly. Every day I am consumed by thoughts of wanting to leave my big tech job and go all-in on ML. I don't mind the work but the actual product I work on is so boring...
I love seeing IronyAI called out like this.