> Was it maybe on the What is Wrong with Hiring podcast?
No, I haven't heard of that one before now. I looked again, but can't find the one I listened to.
Side note: pay transparency is an economy podcaster's wet dream. There are soooo many podcasts about it.
> If you don't know how little you earn, you are less likely to be dissatisfied with your current job and pay the search cost.
The thing is: that is something you can influence. It's not a popular opinion, but employees do have some amount of agency when it comes to compensation.
You can learn about salaries of others, even when it's not fully public.
You can study negotiation.
You can hop jobs every few years to get a raise.
None of that is a job skill (though being high-agency is...), but they are things you can do to get more than average.
Just getting the average OTOH, does not give you any agency in your salary. It's just been decided by circumstances outside your control. (1) And it gives an employer the greatest excuse ever to not go higher: "this is what everybody else is making."
.
The downside of explaining "the other side" is that it makes you look like you're against something. I'm not. I'm just not in favour without reservations. But so much is already written in favour of pay transparency, that it adds nothing to regurgitate those arguments. Any economy podcaster will have several podcasts about the pros.
(1) I've been part of collective bargaining, and this complete disempowerment annoyed me. Instead of the employer and me hashing something out, it's become the union and the employer deciding for me. It felt like mommy and daddy discussing my allowance.