Hacker News Reader

Comment by nbzso | Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

> This is the reality, not some "conspiracy".

It is the absolute textbook definition of conspiracy thinking. You seriously think some shadowy elite started "a lockdown, then a war, centralizing the banking system and unleashing A.I." in furtherance of some unspecified nefarious plan?

Wild claims presented with zero evidence can and should simply be dismissed without further thought.

Is expected plan. And if you want to think critically, do research on these topics. If you expect the media to give you the facts, good luck. The strange part is that everything that I mentioned is in the public domain, as a fact or policy.

Everything you claim makes sense but so would aliens or that we're inside a computer game, etc. Inventing explanations to facts is a trivial skill. Formulating a theory that can predict future events is an actual achievement.

Should have known your reply would be "do your own research". How about no, you go and do it, and wow the entire world with your incredible story.

The reason the media isn't covering this nonsense isn't because of a cover-up, it's because it's nothing but fantasy.

I don't think this is a place for unfounded conspiracy theories.

Literally read the book The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab, it's all discussed there. They literally have a big meeting every year where they invite a bunch of elites to discuss ways they can have more control over the global populace. There's nothing unfounded about it; except for the fact that it maybe doesn't technically count as a conspiracy if it's all done in the open.

> Literally read the book The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab, it's all discussed there

There's no way you read this book. Because I have.

Davos is mentioned once in passing in the entire book. And the whole book is about how we can build a more resilient, more equitable world for everyone, where we respect nature instead of plundering it.

Funny, the other day I had to deal with a former school board trustee making claims about the supposedly sexual and harmful content of a specific book about a transsexual person. My gut told me that what they were saying probably wasn't true so I read the book and voila, none of what the person claimed to be in the book was actually in there. It does say something about a person when they use a study/book, anything that takes time and energy to evaluate to make their point without actually reading it.

It’s actually not that uncommon for people with the same type and level of job to congregate and discuss - or conference - together to learn and socialise with each other.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com