The good news is that what came after that contraction was a huge wave of innovation that became known as Web 2.0. Most of the unicorns you're familiar with today came out of that period. Keep your chin up and you'll see.
The good news is that what came after that contraction was a huge wave of innovation that became known as Web 2.0. Most of the unicorns you're familiar with today came out of that period. Keep your chin up and you'll see.
When you pull up the financials for many newly IPO'd companies you'll see that many of them have questionable ability to ever generate profit, and most certainly not at the size they are at. However all of them have pretty healthy cash reserves from the (obviously overvalued) IPOs they just went through.
Facebook/Meta was the poster-child for "don't worry about profit, just worry about growth!" For years it was assumed that Facebook proved this strategy made sense, but even today we're seeing this giant falter. Even if Facebook pulls it off, it doesn't mean that many of the "growth is all that matters!" startups following in its shadow will.
We'll see companies fail, but this bubble will take a lot longer to unwind than the dotcom bubble.
I think Uber might be a better example of the strategy you're referring to.
So far this is nothing like that from what I can tell. People are taking longer to land positions and at least some of the highest compensation will be very hard to come by, but there seem to be lots of positions. They may just be in insurance companies rather than prestigious tech companies.
In my case, I had worked for a computer company as a product manager (with some coding on the side) and then an IT industry analyst--and there was very little in that vein.
I also did a little HTML/JavaScript and Perl.
I graduated in 1996 and while I did take classes in FORTRAN and COBOL, I also took a class in C.
I learned C++, Microsoft technologies (MFC, COM, etc$ VB6 and SQL on the job as well as HTML, JavaScript and Perl from the O’Reilly series of books by 2000.
It's absolutely not true that getting a job in tech, in general, wasn't a big deal in the early 2000s.
>Back then...
Oh wait...
So, no, in general terms there were no easy money then compared to today (or the years up to today).
But sure, a lot of the money that was around at that time went into IT/dotcom companies instead of into other sectors.