Hacker News Reader

Comment by ChrisMarshallNY | Hacker News Reader

These are such a fun way to go blind!

I remember messing around with a UV laser (pretty sure it was nitrogen, but it needed a pump and all), when I was a young'un.

Never did get it working properly, which is probably good, as I likely would have blinded myself.

I made lots of trouble, when I was a kid. It's a miracle that I'm still alive.

UV lasers are dangerous. Invisible beams, and all.

View on HN

IR lasers, too. Your pupils won't contract because they don't see the light, and a lot of damage can be done very quickly. You might not notice it immediately either, because your brain can paper over small bits of retinal damage to maintain a complete image, like it does with your ocular nerve blind spots.

Lasers are super cool, but I wouldn't DIY one unless I could keep it in a goggles-only room with interlocks on the door to cut power.

I have some retinal damage from an unknown source. All I remember is one morning on the way to school mentioning that there was a spot in my vision that was dark like after looking at the sun, but it hadn’t gone away for hours. over 15years later it never went away, but it is indeed papered over by my brain. Still not sure if it was something internal, or if I played with the wrong end of a laser pointer.

I got something like that not long ago, and it was diagnosed as acute macular neuroretinopathy. Luckily, in many cases it apparently resolves on its own, and mine did. Was the spot slightly off-center in your vision? That's where it tends to happen.

As I recall, it's fairly random and fairly rare, but apparently it's been seen a bit more during COVID.

Mine is a cone shape extending out from my natural blind spot with the point ending just before the center of vision. so It's easy to miss with both eyes open. If I close one eye and look at a word, the word a few words to the right is.. a strange blur of the colours around it.

Both good comments. I love the article, but the "Safety Remarks" probably shouldn't have been so far down in the text!

The pulse duration is measured in nanoseconds. I don't see (no pun intended) how that's going to put enough energy into anything to damage it.

What is the energy deposited over what area and time period on the retina? That's what defines the damage done.

Personally I would never mess with a DIY laser, and especially not one with a wavelength outside of the visible range. Invisible lasers scare me, because the blink reflex isn't there to minimize damage.

Your last point is a good one -- the blink reflex can help avoid harm from visible lasers but it acts in ~100 milliseconds. This laser fires in, what, about 100 nanoseconds? It "blinks" for you, a million times faster than you can.

Say it emits 100 watts for 100 ns when it fires. That's only 10 microjoules of energy. Not a lot of damage potential there unless it's firing at a very fast rate.

Finally, if it's not collimated, it's not going to be concentrated enough to hurt you anyway. I wonder what the beam divergence is like...

Exactly. You'll notice there is no information here on anything related to the numbers essential for safety. I suppose you could derive the energy inputs at least, which sets an upper bound on the energy outputs.

A 2ns pulse at a 100 Hz is small and slow, but I would like some guarantees and I want someone who has at least glanced at ISO 11553.

Some garage bullshit made by someone who clearly hasn't even HEARD of laser safety is not what I want outside of a sealed box.

Some garage bullshit made by someone who clearly hasn't even HEARD of laser safety is not what I want outside of a sealed box

A valid perspective, certainly, but at some point you may need to ask yourself if a site called "Hacker News" is right for you.

Usually the hacks don't have the potential to irreversibly blind someone.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com