They didn't do shit for Ukraine arming people in the donbas in 2014
What on earth are you talking about? Specifically, with references please.
What on earth are you talking about? Specifically, with references please.
Everything is documented
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworl...
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-ukraine-tape-idUKBREA...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Donbas_(2014%E2%80%9320...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-arms-speci...
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/01/world/iraq-sanctions-kill...
and many more
The completely unrelated pieces about Iraq and Poppy Bush, even less so.
Strangely, the Reuters article you linked to was about the separatists getting arms from Russia, not Ukraine.
the main point of that one was the question "where does Ukraine gets their weapon from"
then you have the leaked audio from the US government who clearly was preparing the coup
cross-referencing articles should be common sense
> The completely unrelated pieces about Iraq and Poppy Bush, even less so.
It is all linked, again use articles as reference and history books as data
Napoleon, Hitler? Soviet Union? should ring bells, all of them wanted to push East
Why does the US also want to push NATO East?
It does not. NATO membership is the initiative of Eastern European governments out of fear that Russia will invade them if they remain neutral like Ukraine, against hesitancy and skepticism of North America and Western Europe who thought until last year that this is a silly idea and a manifestation of historic trauma, and not a real danger.
It's easier to ignore history books and follow a government propaganda, you don't have to think! saves some neurons, or perhaps that's because we don't need them stupid neurons