You cherry-picked my comment to ignore my efforts at less-anecdotal proof. It was very much the zeitgeist to advocate for teaching computer programming back in the era I specified to encourage children to be in tech:

2014: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/226287-largest-school-...

2015: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/256385-chicago-mayor-c...

> Group B is a superset that includes group A!

Come on now, you can't make that claim without clown make-up on. If B is a superset of A, what's the point of your distinction then? ~You just made a stronger claim than mine; now you are also saying _everyone_ in A liked the show too.~

(EDIT: OK, as @defrost pointed out below, your claim is about intended audience rather than people liking the show. But doesn't change my view that asserting B is a superset of A makes your distinction pointless. Nor that using the term intended audience actually carries some burden of proof with it.)

Here's a picture of a superset to aid comprehension:

   +-------------------+
   | Set B             |
   | +---------------+ |
   | | Set A         | |
   | +---------------+ |
   +-------------------+