Exactly ! I remember the original email mentioned deletion and now they say "we never said that".
Time to get rid of Docker in our world.
Time to get rid of Docker in our world.
Free Team organizations are a legacy subscription tier that no longer exists. This tier included many of the same features, rates, and functionality as a paid Docker Team subscription.
After reviewing the list of accounts that are members of legacy Free Team organizations, we’ve identified yours as potentially being one of them.
If you own a legacy Free Team organization, access to paid features — including private repositories — will be suspended on April 14, 2023 (11:59 pm UTC). Upgrade your subscription before April 14, 2023 to continue accessing your organization.
If you don’t upgrade to a paid subscription, Docker will retain your organization data for 30 days, after which it will be subject to deletion. During that time, you will maintain access to any images in your public repositories, though rate limitations will apply. At any point during the 30-day period, you can restore access to your organization account if you upgrade to a paid subscription. Visit our FAQ [1] for more information.
[1] https://web.docker.com/rs/790-SSB-375/images/privatereposfaq...
"If you don’t upgrade to a paid subscription, Docker will retain your organization data for 30 days, after which it will be subject to deletion. During that time, you will maintain access to any images in your public repositories, though rate limitations will apply."
The cynical devil on my left shoulder is telling me "Some smartass in an emergency meeting noted the ambiguity in that second sentence, and suggested lets just claim that 'During that time you will maintain access to any images' did not actually mean it's obvious implication that 'after that time you will no linger have access to any images' and this is all just a big misunderstanding" - and that how we ended up with this new "clarification".
The even more cynical devil on my right shoulder is telling me some actively evil asshole intentionally wrote that ambiguous sentence to give themselves a 'get out of jail card' in case complaints went viral...
Works like a charm on our macbooks, very neat.
Even if we need to pay, I’m looking for alternatives not Docker Inc. - There is only so much you can take.
I don’t want to rely on them anymore.
Way more enterprise appropriate, for example - granular control on caches
What a thing, docker. I can't get over the staying power it has had despite... Everything.
It's not just the runtime.
If so, I think Nix being able to create docker images addresses that specific concern.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean.
See https://nix.dev/tutorials/building-and-running-docker-images
Or do you mean run as in "use docker image(s) within a nix expression". Like if you have a webapp with a nix devshell but want to start the docker postgres container for development?
You can do that too, yes.
This is just a big "fuck you" to non company supported open source projects, as it turns out even ones labelled "sponsored css" on Docker Inc's own website.
Which are all clearly insignificant and unimportant, dumb little command line utilities and libraries like, say, curl...
https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/2314#issuecomm...
It's like saying I have to install `vi` via Docker... please don't tell me vim has a Docker hub repo too...