> Forced to sell at a 50% discount (if they want liquidity)
Obviously no one is literally forced to sell. Is this really that hard to understand? This entire thread is about how by not going IPO, the employees were unable to sell. I'm sure they would have preferred to sell a few years ago instead of paying less taxes now.
It also seems that some employees' options are expiring, so while they aren't literally forced to sell, in reality, they are.