Software and the engineers that make it proves itself to be very valuable, engineers should be compensated accordingly.
Software and the engineers that make it proves itself to be very valuable, engineers should be compensated accordingly.
Not to mention that the engineers who do manage to start these companies are usually not top of the engineering field but rather the ones who are also good at sales and marketing and product management.
Software is a team sport.
Beware of survivor bias, for every successful business, there might be a 1000 failed ones.
For example, me.
(Hmm, perhaps I should try to use GPT to turn my old desktop Java shareware into browser-based Javascript freeware).
Maybe as open-source, the product could have some success, but I don't know how to "sell" open-source or make a revenue from it.
Well, if those people are allmost worthless, then why not proof that, by making a buisness that thrives without them?