> The inflammation associated with these wounds can disrupt the body’s normal electric signals, impeding the migration of new cells that can support the healing process.
> The inflammation associated with these wounds can disrupt the body’s normal electric signals, impeding the migration of new cells that can support the healing process.
That said it is somewhat suspect, and the hypothesis is not really falsifiable by the experiment which is why the journal article itself is not claiming to test that. It is really disappointing that IEEE didn't actually link to or name the article directly. Very poor science journalism there.
The article is that they observed this process working, not why it works. Maybe it works because it kills bacteria...?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S10849...
> The first electronic bandage the body can absorb can apply electric signals to speed the healing of wounds by 30 percent, a new study finds.
If you have 20 minutes to watch this ted talk interview I highly recommend it. My mind was blown. Your DNA determines the hardware, but there's a lot of non chemical communication that goes on between cells that determine how they behave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XheAMrS8Q1c
Once you realize that cells can effectively communicate with each other via voltage, things like whats described about electrical bandages become less surprising.
If you've got a little more time (2 hours) there's a much longer more detailed interview here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0TNfysTazc
This is some next level stuff. Imagine DNA describes what your hardware looks like, but the software your cells run may be bioelectrical in large enough ways to consider that maybe your skin has some level cognition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron-beam_processing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_irradiation#Electron_beam