> it used to be a very very busy Starbucks
Then it's an ideal spot for the union to open their union shop. I don't really understand why you think it would sit vacant.
Then it's an ideal spot for the union to open their union shop. I don't really understand why you think it would sit vacant.
That does cost them money, but if we assume they're fucking with the union then it's very much in their interest to not break the lease and instead leave the location empty -- because they probably do just want to reopen the same location once the union has dissipated. (Also, breaking a commercial lease often doesn't save you very much money, so...)
> it's very much in their interest to not break the lease and instead leave the location empty
There's an easy way to test that theory. Have the union make them an offer.
Besides, there's no particular reason the union has to set up shop in that store. They can pick anyplace else. As I mentioned before, people open coffee shops all the time. It isn't rocket science.
Stop being obtuse.
> Stop being obtuse.
LOL