I argue it is the opposite, like immunity, mild injuries prepare the young to recognize and deal with danger. As a parent myself, I never want to shield my children from all danger, only those severe one.
I argue it is the opposite, like immunity, mild injuries prepare the young to recognize and deal with danger. As a parent myself, I never want to shield my children from all danger, only those severe one.
I wonder if monkey bars worsen that kind of thing be creating a culture of risk acceptance, making it socially awkward to say "No i won't climb that, no I won't lift that with no hand truck, and I'm certainly not joining the football team".
Rather than teaching people how to manage risk, could it be teaching people TO manage risk as opposed to just rejecting it entirely if it's not necessary?
So, for example bruises are ok, broken bones are tolerated if it is a rare occurrence, getting impaled is definitely not ok, so you can build a platform you can fall from, but if it is high enough, put something to break the fall, and make absolutely sure there can't be a sharp stick in the way. Minor cuts and splinters are ok, so you can use rough materials, but chopped off fingers are not, so be very careful with mechanisms.
I take comfort in knowing that humans have been raising humans for a million years, and it usually works out alright. That must mean our own instincts are mostly good enough.
Also want to point out what another commenter mentioned; technically anything that can break a bone can do more damage than that.
Of course, if anything terrible were ever to happen, I'll probably beat myself up over it and be certain I took too many unnecessary risks. Those are the odds we play for ourselves and our loved ones every day.
Last month the lesson was momentum, this month it is gravity.
https://neurosciencenews.com/overprotective-parents-child-lo...