Hacker News Reader

Comment by dragontamer | Hacker News Reader

"Prices are too high" is the problem people care about.

"Inflation is still high" means the 1st derivative is still too high, and that prices will continue to go higher.

"Inflation has cooled" means the 2nd derivative is negative. The 2nd derivative being low is a necessity to lower inflation (1st derivative).

View on HN

The question I have is that even with the 1st derivative at 0 (ie no inflation), the prices will still be too high. I believe prices won’t drop.

That is correct.

Your beliefs are also irrelevant here. If prices were dropping, inflation would be default be negative. That is, deflation.

That's because the government wants to steal your money through inflation.

This is an interesting statement, obviously, cash assets suffer inflation, but is this where money is to be stole? If prices are going up, and I have goods or stock in companies that sell goods benefiting increased price, has anything really been stolen?

I would think that intentional inflation is a signal to spend faster, holding money is bad. Nothing to do with theft.

> where money is to be stole

I think the big one is at the large scale: government reducing it's debt burden by devaluing the currency that is used to repay their creditors.

But even on the small scale it seems like they win:

Let's say you have 100k in a HYSA that yields 5%. And the inflation rate is 10%. Not too far from current numbers.

After 1 year, your real (inflation-adjusted) return is -5%, so you've lost 5k of spending power. But then, at tax time, you have to write a check to the govt to pay taxes on your 5k "gain".

Not to be too theoretical, but aren't we the government? It is not some other entity, it is reducing our own debt burden that we owe collectively (presuming you are American). If anything the most angry should be foreign holders of American currency.

Foreign debt is only a piece of it:

https://www.thebalancemoney.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-de....

For example: think of the retiree who holds most of their nest egg in (nominal) treasury bonds.

Hah. Aren't americans always complaining about how monied interests control the outcome of their elections? As for europe there's different electoral shenanigans like holding a referendum then ignoring the result or taking more than 500 days to form a government after a national election because the stupid system doesn't deliver a clear winner.

If cash loses value due to inflation, where does it go? Now for old fashioned inflation that would be obvious: to the people who charge more for goods and services. But with current monetary shenanigans it isn't. You might be tempted to say the printers. Who are they? The central bank? Who controls that? The government? How does the government enforce anything? The threat of violence. Therefore stealing: government taking something of value by force or threat of force.

The issue isn't that those well enough off to hold significant stock in those companies are suffering. It's the people who don't have shares and 2nd homes to liquidate.

But the poor typically are not cash rich either and have debt, debt that is better serviced with increased wages that inflation can bring.

Of course it is all predicated on wages/inflation in step which does not seem to be true.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com