Think about it, if we accept the theory that computation equals consciousness, then then is little to investigate further. Just calculate something, and voila, consciousness exists.
It is this closing down of inquiry that I push against. My assertion is that consciousness is deeper, it cannot be reduced to computation.
How would you even prove otherwise? If it arises from computation, what is conscious? Is it the algorithm? Is it the electric circuits? It is the physical machine?
It is interesting to note my consciousness is bound up what a notion of what my body is. I can identify the limits of my body and make a distinction between it and my environment. What determines the conscious boundary of a entity performing calculations?
On the other hand, there are many strong arguments against consciousness arising from mere computation, some of which I have enumerated.