>That and the cartel can just straight up roll up with guns and take all your shit, why wouldn't they just do that if they wanted your money?
Being robbed by the government is more palatable to tourists. Would you travel to a place where ununiformed criminals shook you down for $100 a day?
What you are describing is a tax. A tax is generally understood to reduce an activity which is why cigarettes etc are highly taxed. Not sure this is making the argument you think it is. In fact you are describing a system where the cartel disincentives this behavior, by making it less profitable.
>Being robbed by the government is more palatable to tourists.
Hard disagree with this one.
Absolutely correct and totally irrelevant to the original point, which was that the administrative overhead for the cartel is vanishingly small.
>Hard disagree
It was palatable enough for you to travel to Mexico.
This is purely a matter of opinion but being told I have to worry about the cartels and the police is a bigger pill to swallow than just worrying about the cartels. The fact I personally was willing to go doesn't indicate I find being robbed in uniform more palatable.
In any case, you're telling me I "need" this or that to disagree with a mere opinion about "palate", which is just insane. An opinion cannot be proved, I think you know this, and I don't see you offering some kind of poll that samples tourists about who they'd rather be robbed by or whatever you may be looking for either so I will disengage now.
>That and the cartel can just straight up roll up with guns and take all your shit, why wouldn't they just do that if they wanted your money?
...and I gave you this answer (paraphrased)...
>Because it's easier to get the cops to do it for them.
Looks like we're done here.