If you would like to ask it more things about this article I have it searchable here: https://app.conifer.chat/threads/37321fdc-6a04-4c56-a857-21b...
A) these realities can't have people - they're not real enough to be called that
B) physics will be different - that would be a great scientific revelation
C) physics will be the same - making the premise meaningless
This is from the math model where the resulting path of a particle can be figured out by finding all possible paths. Then what follows is the conjecture that because the math works maybe those particles really do travel by every possible path. There's no proof of this, and it's very hard to test because the result has to be the same.
So maybe our reality is the sum of particles taking every possible path. Or may be it isn't. Wake me up when the article title is "Our reality IS the sum of all possible realities."
If we put ourselves inside the system then saying anything about it comes with a lot of implied philosophy about what "we" are.
All next realities are weighted based on their probability given the current one. The probabilities are based on our knowledge of the equations of physics. Some realities are more likely than others and adding this all up results in an average outcome. At the smallest scales the average outcome is not actually what happens, but time is a great equalizer.
And even then it only really works if the waveforms are infinite in duration.
Is there a Gibbs Phenomenon equivalent for path integrals?