You are basically arguing P = NP, but it isn't known to be the case. As far as we can tell, keeping score is much easier in general than finding states that yield a high score.
[1] What about some kind of competition where you have to react and act based on visual stimulus? And you have to do it perfectly?
Given that we don’t (seem to) have widespread beta-ready autonumous cars yet, I’m guessin that this is still the case…
Its also a little strange to be called a contrarian in this instance (yes generally speaking true) because it does not seem to be contrarian to point out obvious counter examples. It feels like a way for you to easily dismiss any other opinion because you already binned it as some one denying reality in order to pointlessly argue.