There are a couple of problems though. How would the model be trained? It has to process child faces. This is a huge red flag by itself. The second problem is that it might get more people addicted to child porn. If it becomes so easy to access who can tell how many more will find it attractive. And then you’ll end up with a much bigger problem than the one you had when started.
Would you similarly argue gay porn is likely to make more people gay?
Arguably much of it only due to destigmatisation and legislation. But even then it only seems obvious that many people who would otherwise have lived "straight lives" have been "introduced" to homosexuality due to gay porn, as the number of "this makes me question my sexuality" comments under various gay-erotic content show.
The same argument is regularly brought up around drugs. Modifying chemical formulas brings out stuff like 1P-LSD, which is a functional analogue of LSD, but has been legal in lots of countries for years because it wasn't covered by the existing laws. With that argument, you'd expect everyone and their aunt to be tripping, but we didn't. There's a subculture that is interested in psychotropic drugs, but it's small, and availability doesn't increase it.
Nah, the second problem is escalation.
The fear is that once you've burned out on fakes, you start looking for the real stuff (or physical encounters) to get your dopamine fix.
Buying a sex doll with proportions that are closer to a child than an adult is also illegal.
Given that some sex dolls are partial. (not the entire legs for example) the difference can get murky
My references here are to Norwgian law.
In the US this is not true.