> this is just how these animals sustain themselves.
Because in economics not everyone is a Keynesian who just ascribes behavior to animal spirits.
Because in economics not everyone is a Keynesian who just ascribes behavior to animal spirits.
And in this case perhaps what people are upset about isn’t simply moralism, but the potential irrationality that drives the behavior we are all witnessing.
When would it be time for you to consider adjusting your framework here? Is there really enough variation in the obervables here to justify seeing each company as its own fully-personed snowflake?