It’s a good thing, I’m seeing less JS frameworks getting created now
"Naming a framework can be a crucial aspect of its success. It's important to choose a name that is memorable, catchy, and represents the core values and goals of the framework.
Here are a few suggestions:
Prodigy: A framework that aims to make web development simple and efficient.
Velocity: A fast-performing framework that emphasizes speed and agility.
Eon: A modern and innovative framework that incorporates the latest web development trends and technologies.
Apex: A framework that emphasizes scalability and reliability, helping developers build robust and scalable applications.
Fusion: A framework that seamlessly integrates different technologies, tools, and libraries to create a unified and seamless development experience."
I'm looking forward to hiring a prodigy.js expert with 10 years of prodigy.js experience.
Tried it, it did okay on some high-level stuff but couldn't get to working code: https://imgur.com/a/HModV0f
Do you think it's fair to hold it to the task of instantly creating a new JavaScript framework from scratch and implementing it? This is a task that multiple experts planning and collaborating in different areas of software engineering could perform together with extreme difficulty over a long period.
On the other hand, I was surprised that it came up with working, "correct" code for a difficult task:
Pastebin for the code:
I checked it and it is correct for n up to hundreds of thousands. (I'm not sure if that is really how matrix powers are supposed to work, but overall, its function returns correct exact solutions for the problem and worked without any modification.)
I find both conversations I just linked pretty impressive in their own ways.