I'd invite you to spend some time considering the difference between legacy childrens entertainment media and an algorithmically driven platform that has, at best, meagre ex-post-facto content moderation.
Children need to be able to handle boredom. If you need to hand over your phone to your toddler just to keep them calm, you've got some work to do.
The amount of kids in strollers with a parent's phone in hand is just staggering. Or a tablet in the headrest for watching shows on any car trip over 15 minutes.
The original commenter added more info in a reply in this thread that might've taken some of the steam out of this remark:
> I haven't banned the kid from Youtube, just didn't specifically direct them there. Except for a few times. I think we looked up sign language tutorials (that was a big deal 3-4 years ago) and some drawing tutorials for watercolours.
If my kid, at 10 years old, has hacked my router and keeps actively deleting the relevant access and DNS logs, they have a future career in information security :D
Some of the suggestions there are a bit dystopian - like locking your kids devices in a safe ... You are probably fairly safe at 10, for a year or two!
"The poll, posted on Facebook by internet security vendor SmoothWall, found almost half (49 per cent) of 13-17 year olds admitted to using illicit tools to access blocked websites in school."
https://www.itpro.co.uk/607677/kids-bypass-school-internet-s... (2008 - guessing that number is a little higher now that it was then)
It sounds stupid even to me now, but it's really not easy to fix such things at the age of 30+. Those emotional wounds were deep, even if in retrospect silly and unintentional. Deep enough to change how the 10 y.o. me saw himself in relation to the world. And I only first realized what happened around 18-20 y.o., by which time I was well used to never fully opening up in front of my family. It's like a "default setting" burned into the wetware at this point - something I have to consciously struggle to overcome even to this day.
So yeah, it's likely a disconnected parent, not deceptive child. But "disconnected" tends to imply the parent doesn't care, which I don't think is the case either. Rather, like in my experience, the parent may care very much, but not achieve anything, because the connection has been severed, possibly accidentally, and neither the parent nor the kid are fully aware they've lost that link.
It is not being deceptive on the side of the kids. That framing implies adult are entitled to complete overbearing control and kid is not entitled to have private thoughts. It might be parent being untrustworthy or checked out or oblivious, but if not combined with emotional wounds it might be the kid becoming own person.
As a parent you have to accept that from 12y old you will know very little of your kids thoughts and dirty secrets.