Maybe, if NIMBYism is so prevalent across the political spectrum in the united states, maybe the NIMBYs have a somewhat valid perspective that we should at least consider?
Or, maybe that is not the basis for a sound argument
Put another way, NIMBYism is not so much prevalent (i.e. a majority hold that view) as dominant (i.e. it prevails nonetheless). They're not the same thing.
This is a concentrated 'harm' vs distributed gain, except there really is very little 'harm'.
Luckily, population density brings economics of scale for walkable areas and public transport, so the need for parking should reduce.