No it doesn't, it's not bundling if both products are free and it's not bundling when you don't actually own any of them. There are important nuances between the two cases that some people choose to overlook.
In legal terms you don't own Windows either - MS gives you a license to use it.
The question is, can you use your ownership of the platform to destroy competitors of apps on that platform? When does it cross into "monopoly"? I have no idea. It seems fair to me that the creator of a platform should be able to introduce new applications and place them in a preferred spot for all to see (e.g. facebook's own apps). As long as this was clear to everyone from the beginning. However, strong-arming OEMs and others into specifically doing anti-competitive things on your behalf is probably wrong.