> how about people running AI only feed them information that they legally have the right to use?
That's what they did!
It was in fair use. So yes, they did have the right to legally train the data on copyrighted images.
That's what they did!
It was in fair use. So yes, they did have the right to legally train the data on copyrighted images.
Many artists don't believe this and the law is very much unclear.
In many cases the AI generated work literally looks like a clone.