[1] in the older sense of the phrase; nowadays most people use it differently, but it originally meant ~"answering without really answering".
And that's just a problem on both sides of the aisle. It will probably continue to dominate modern politics, until improving democracy becomes more profitable than making people argue passionately.
> and teaching young men and women to blindly follow is always a bad idea
Uh huh? Sounds like you’d have no problem with blind following as long as it aligns with your beliefs.
I never once claimed that there’s evidence that “teaching young men and women to blindly follow is always a bad idea” came from blindly following beliefs. That doesn’t even make ducking sense? Are you good? You seem a bit out of it. If you’re going to reply, at least make it comprehensible. Also tolerance was not even in my mind when I wrote that so take your blind copy/paste buzzwords back to Reddit.