Don't forget that in both countries public healthcare has to do a lot for the over-65s who don't have spare money for spiralling costs.
Don't forget that in both countries public healthcare has to do a lot for the over-65s who don't have spare money for spiralling costs.
A great counter example is Signapore where each individual has a mandatory savings account which can only be used for healthcare. However, catastrophic illnesses and insufficient funds are covered by the gov. Another element of the scheme is that the savings accounts can be used for family members. This incentives people to seek the cheapest care, and keep family members healthy. While the poor, retired etc are still taken care of.
The problem I have with the NHS is that I dont see what my care costs at any point. I dont think that leads to good decision making.
How much extra do you want them to spend on computing this? To what extent do you actually want cost factored into your care?