> Is this all just a giant social experiment to see what will happen to the language and community given no leadership and x-number of years?
It's pretty clear already: arc has failed.
It's pretty clear already: arc has failed.
Failed at what, exactly? Being a toaster?
You guys all seem to be projecting your own expectations about "language and community" onto Arc, none of which have to do with the stated goals of the project. What part of making-a-better-Lisp-where-better-mostly-equals-shorter-programs don't you understand?
1. A completed version of arc 2. 100 years since 1.