"You clearly haven't taken Meth."
If MDMA users claim it's profound, is it really the same in the eyes of a meth user who has done both MDMA and meth? If the meth user can invalidate the experience with his own, then what does it say in general?
(edit - rate limited so can't respond below. 'Meth' is a strong stimulant, with some associated euphoria, it's not a profound emotional experience like mdma. Yes I'm speaking from experience. Phenethylamine-derived drugs are massively varied in their effects, see also for example the true-psychedelic mescaline, 2C-x and, well, the whole of Pihkal)
My guess is that once you take Meth, MDMA isn't really that big of a deal anymore.
They're totally different. My experience of them was totally different.
I found mdma more personal, soul-engaging, pleasurable and enlightning.
Meth was just overwhelming, rushy, detached feeling euphoria with a air of anxiety.
why do you keep making comments like this about meth in this thread?
better comparison, LSD and shrooms are very profound, but in a different way than E, think like introspective -vs- social
even better comparison is 2ct7, felt like a nice balanced combination of mdma and lsd, profound but not overwhelmingly