I wonder if that resentment would have been the same toward the Internet in 1997. You know, that useless thing for hackers and scammers that only benefits crime and should be regulated like heck by governments for our safety.
But 97 was late for the internet. ARPANET dates back to the 1970s .. as a government project!
There was a great deal of value in the internet liberating people from monopolist telcos and their billing practices, as well as from borders, and there was nowhere near the same level of scamminess and crime. Why? Because there was no money changing hands.
My grandparents had an AOL account in 1997.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34333210
The universe has delivered with impeccable timing.
BTC fell through a few of these whole number price floors on the way down, this is just the one that finally broke the momentum. If it is going to continue to fall then downward pressure will build up until it overwhelms these buy orders and it will crack down to the next floor. Kind of like the 40k to 30k fall, the 30k to 20k fall or the 20k to 16k fall.
Even if there seems to be a trading volume, i’m skeptical of that trading. Maybe it’s just painting the tape?
What are those people achieving by trading the thing at about the same price? Are we churning believers? Why would the price be stable?
https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_transactions_per_day#....
https://hcburger.com/blog/powerlaw/index.html
https://twitter.com/DeFi_initiate/status/1576543256627724288...
Of course, being historically consistent is not mandatory. The models may break, especially now that we have higher interest rates.
2020
2019
2013-2016
2010
2009
2002
and 1986.
For a 52-year period, that's not too many years. Just a fifth.
If the Fed were genuinely targeting 2%, I'd expect half.
The geometric mean inflation rate of this period is 3.92%, almost double the stated target.
I used data from here: https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/infl...