> you have to think of the results, not the source
You can. But it's equally valid to look at the source and say "this should have been replaced long ago"
Which is really has, except for tiny markets.
No reason it can't be improved on drastically.
You can. But it's equally valid to look at the source and say "this should have been replaced long ago"
Which is really has, except for tiny markets.
No reason it can't be improved on drastically.
No comments yet.