Shouldn't we just be viewing ChatGPT as a lense to view data? A more useful interface for searching and making sense of data.
If someone has reported this info in stackoverflow, it will be reported here.
Garbage in, garbage out ..
If someone has reported this info in stackoverflow, it will be reported here.
Garbage in, garbage out ..
The AI isn't getting this made-up information from anywhere on the internet; it's creating it itself because that's what it's made to do: generate good sounding sentences that "make sense" for some user input.
The data model is combining information that HAS been found on the internet.
The language model allows an interface that can be presented and controlled by using conversational natural language.
Second, the "language model" is a text completion engine. What can be controlled using conversational natur language is ChatGPT, which is a conversational engine developed out of a language model.
Why exactly have you placed information between quote marks?
See, "The Panther" is not a poem of Petőfi. The quote was not from any other work of him. It's not from the Rilke poem (or its translations I know of) either. It's completely made up, but also made to sound very plausible, to the point where if I didn't know better or look it up, I could be convinced. The only thing suspicios is the lack of rhyming.
I put information in quotes because I don't consider made up stuff information.
I also find it extremely unlikely that someone on the internet invented this tale about "the panther" and chatgpt just rephrased it or quoted it. The internet is full of actual true lists of Petőfi's famous poems, but it isn't full of people inventing fake poems of his.
On a very theoretical level, sure, it's a rephrasing and combination of pieces of stuff ChatGPT has actually been trained on, because it has seen hungarian text, it has learned stuff about Petőfi, it has seen every single word that its using. But after a certain point, combining known words and text structures with bits of semantic knowledge in unexpected ways becomes a new invented thing, instead of just quotes.
But you can see many examples of ChatGPT inventing things like urls, python libraries, etc. It's perfectly capable of bulshitting believably.
What you're describing is a hunch.
You can ask him to synthesize the main thoughts of a philosopher, and it will produce an original set of sentences that nobody has ever written anywhere else.
Yes.
This is the essence of human creativity.
> It’s a bit too much to ask to an AI don’t you think ?
I'm actually standing that AI isn't able to do this, so I'd definitely agree with this statement.