“…driving salinity to levels incompatible with the lake’s food webs” - this is a fantastic was of saying everything will die.
Although in a doc titled “Emergency Measures Needed” it might more useful to have less euphemism.
Although in a doc titled “Emergency Measures Needed” it might more useful to have less euphemism.
That’s a lot more blunt. Is “will disappear” editorial? I’d be OK with that one as an academic journal EIC.
It’s a variously slippery/tractive surface, sloped in many directions.
ETA: I’m puzzled how my comment above is a detriment to conversation. If you see it differently, why not engage?
It's not editorial - it's lifted from the report:
> If this rate of water loss continues, the lake would be on track to disappear in the next five years.