No, Tesla is still very overpriced for a car company based on hype.
No, Tesla is still very overpriced for a car company based on hype.
Tesla: mcap $388B, debt $9B, op income $12B, free cash flow $9B
GM: mcap $49B, debt $110B, op income $10B, free cash flow $1B
Ford: mcap $48B, debt $139B, op income $11B, free cash flow $3B
Tesla makes more money than Ford or GM, while having much less debt. The fact that they sell fewer cars means their margins are higher, and they have more room to grow. Maybe they shouldn't be worth eight times more than Ford or GM, but they should definitely be worth more.
And if you believe that the industry is going electric, then Tesla is already there, while legacy auto has a lot of work to do, and Tesla's low debt load makes them better positioned to do lots of R&D.
Edit. I'm not implying that Tesla is fairly priced, underpriced or overpriced. But this whole situation reminds me a time when I invested in Tesla IPO after reading lots of "Don't DO IT!" articles in media.
It is totally valid to criticize musk for not delivering a full self driving car on when he said he would, but that hasn't put the profitability of the company at risk. If GM cannot deliver a volume Car at a profit in a world where ICE is illegal what is going to happen?
Tesla: $31.0 bn
GM: $65.3 bn
Ford: $42.1 bn
Tesla doesn't have this overhang and is also growing very fast.
It's a brutal business, which is why I think it's fascinating.
It's not going to completely correct in a day. As you note, its value may be inflated by two orders of magnitude. Musk's hijinks with Twitter have cost him dearly in investor confidence -- both indirectly, as his behavior there is erratic, and directly, as his loans for that deal are backed with Tesla stock. And then there's the non-delivery of FSD, which is the real "dream" that he's been selling so hard.