So it's not exacly a slippery slope.
On the other hand there's clear benefits of DNA database now in catching murderers and the like. So a clear win.
I don't consume sugar or alcohol, but it's also not my choice to say what you should do, especially not because of your genetics, yet if I were an insurance company we sign a contract that gives me that right, so why enable it?
This seems unavoidable otherwise.
* (and that is completely okay, different strokes and all that)
I don’t understand the logic of the supposed threat you’re talking about: if you’re so worried about some future dystopian authority that throws its ‘enemies’ into prison without them committing any crime, why would they need a relative’s long-ago stored DNA to do it?